Skip to content

Conversation

@andy-stark-redis
Copy link
Contributor

@andy-stark-redis andy-stark-redis commented Apr 28, 2025

DOC-5150 and DOC-5151

For the C# examples, I'm not sure if it's clearer to define the GetEmbedding and GetFloatEmbedding functions the way I have, or if it would be better to have the GetFloatEmbedding as it is with another function to convert the result to a binary string. I guess it doesn't make much difference but I'd be happy to hear any thoughts about whether one approach is better than the other.

@andy-stark-redis andy-stark-redis requested a review from a team April 28, 2025 12:57
@andy-stark-redis andy-stark-redis self-assigned this Apr 28, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@dwdougherty dwdougherty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coupla nits. Otherwise, LGTM.


[Redis Query Engine]({{< relref "/develop/interact/search-and-query" >}})
lets you index vector fields in [hash]({{< relref "/develop/data-types/hashes" >}})
enables you to index vector fields in [hash]({{< relref "/develop/data-types/hashes" >}})
Copy link
Collaborator

@dwdougherty dwdougherty Apr 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like the SG prefers "lets you", if I read that correctly. Not a big deal.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dwdougherty This is what I get for asking Cursor for style advice :-( It actually said that the guide prefers "enables" (which it doesn't, you are correct), and it has rewritten some of the other stuff in a way that I'm not sure is better. It's as well I checked the text again because I've now noticed it has even trashed some quite useful links (I've added them back in now).

I'll be more careful next time I try using AI for this sort of thing!

@andy-stark-redis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dwdougherty Thanks for the review!

@andy-stark-redis andy-stark-redis merged commit 1889ff4 into main Apr 28, 2025
5 checks passed
@andy-stark-redis andy-stark-redis deleted the DOC-5150-js-vec-json-examples branch April 28, 2025 14:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants